|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GLAUCOMA GRAND ROUNDS Trauma at Age 5 Leads by J. James Thimons, O.D. A 75-year-old white male was referred for consultation following extreme elevation of intraocular pressure in both
eyes. The patient was in no acute distress nor did he have any significant medical history. He hadn't had a physical check-up in 10 years, but reported no evidence of diabetes, hypertension or other systemic illness. Family medical
and ocular histories were negative. He was taking no medications and denied any allergies. The patient did describe an episode of trauma at age 5. At that time his sight decreased significantly in his left eye. He underwent no
medical or surgical intervention. Physical Examination The slit lamp examination showed intact corneal tissue bilaterally, with no evidence of trauma.
The anterior chamber was deep in the right eye but significantly more shallow in the left on van Herick's test. The left iris showed iridodialysis extending from 10-1 o'clock. A redundant roll of iris tissue located near the pupil
margin corresponded to the separation of the iris at its root. The lens of the right eye showed a 3+-4+ nuclear sclerosis. The left eye demonstrated a totally diffuse cataract with no penetration of the slit beam beyond the area
immediately posterior to the anterior lens capsule. Applanation tensions were 52mm Hg O.D. and greater than 80mm Hg O.S. Gonioscopy showed significant angle recession: in the right eye between 3 and 8 o'clock and in the left
from near the area of iridodialysis through approximately 9 o'clock. The fundus exam showed a cup-to-disc ratio of approximately 0.7-0.8 with a shallow cup and a very difficult interpretation due to the cataract in that eye. The
cataract in the left eye blocked a view of the fundus. Visual field testing with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II system using a 24-2 SITA standard program showed a surprisingly normal response given the clinical presentation.
Discussion Angle-recession glaucoma has a
unique pathophysiology. The tearing of the ciliary body, which occurs at the time of the blunt trauma, grossly indicates the level of tissue damage. However, the microtrauma to the trabecular meshwork produces the fibrotic scarring
that eventually compromises aqueous outflow. Another interesting aspect of traumatic glaucoma is that the traumatic event frequently happens much earlier than the onset of the disease. Clinical studies and general observation
attest that the time between the trauma and onset of disease can vary from a few weeks to several decades. In this case the apparent provoking trauma was a severe blow to the head and eyes when the patient was young. The finding
that the pressure was slightly elevated in the good eye took place at another practitioner's office about eight years before our visit. Treatment We gave the patient
additional doses of Alphagan Q30min over the next hour, and measured the pressure on the half hour. At the first measurement, IOPs were 52mm Hg O.D. and greater than 80mm Hg O.S. At the second measurement, IOPs were 46mm Hg and
78mm Hg. By the third measurement at 5:30 p.m., IOPs were 32mm Hg and 65mm Hg. Since his IOP decreased significantly over a two-hour period in the office, we sent him home on Betimol and Alphagan one drop BID O.U. Unlike most
angle-closure patients, individuals who present with extreme pressure elevation due to primary or secondary open angle glaucoma, and who haven't previously been treated with medical therapy, typically respond well to the initial
application of topical medications. Rarely will you need to institute oral therapy. But if you must, use either Diamox (acetazolamide) 250mg Q30min for an hour or Neptazane (methazolamide) 50mg. In patients with angle recession,
cholinergic drugs probably will have no significant effect because the damage to the trabecular meshwork largely precludes the IOP-lowering effect of pilocarpine. At follow-up at 8:15 the next morning, this patient's pressures
were 16mm Hg O.D. and 30mm Hg O.S. The slit lamp findings were the same and the patient's optic nerve showed relatively less cupping (about 0.6) than the day before. Cupping can decrease to a mild degree following reduction in
pressure. This interesting phenomenon can occur in individuals whose IOP rises relatively quickly and whose optic nerve bows posteriorly as a result. This correlates with the patient's relatively normal visual field testing
juxtaposed with extremely elevated IOP. Also, the appearance of the optic nerve the day before seemed inconsistent with the quality of the visual field. Now that the eye is stable, future management aims toward visual
rehabilitation with cataract extraction or possibly a combined procedure to aid in IOP control in the right eye. We will treat the left eye with ocular antihypertensives to prevent pain and provide comfort. There's no advantage to
surgical intervention unless the lens becomes phacolytic and creates inflammation. |
| | | | | | | |