Case Report
Noncompliance Compounds
Glaucomatous Vision Loss

This patient avoided follow-up for CRVO
for four months. Secondary glaucoma reduced his vision to 10/300 O.S.

by Andrew Gurwood, O.D., Contributing Editor and John Mileski, O.D., Philadelphia

A 67-year-old white male presented following a sudden onset of blurred vision in his left eye. He said it was like looking through wax paper. His ocular history included hypertensive retinopathy grade II and atherosclerotic changes in both eyes. His medical history was remarkable for hypertension, for which he was taking oral catopril. 

Clinical Findings

1. Multiple flame-shaped hemorrhages with scattered cotton-wool patches were apparent in the left eye.

Best-corrected visual acuities were 20/25 O.D. and 20/70 O.S. at distance and 0.4/0.4m O.D. and 0.4/1.5m O.S. There was no improvement with pinhole. External examination was normal (color, cover, motilities). There was no evidence of a relative afferent defect.

Confrontation fields uncovered a relative central scotoma in the left eye, confirmed by Amsler grid. Refraction revealed stable myopia with presbyopia: -1.50 O.D./+2.50 and -1.75 O.S./+2.50. Biomicros-copy demonstrated normal anterior segment structures and grade IV Van Herick angles. Goldmann applanation tonometry measured intraocular pressures of 16mm Hg O.U.

Dilated fundus evaluation found normal nerves and peripheries and grade II atherosclerotic and hypertensive changes O.U. The posterior pole O.S. exhibited multiple flame-shaped hemorrhages emanating from the disc into all four quadrants with scattered cotton-wool patches (figure 1).

Diagnosis
We diagnosed central retinal vein occlusion of the left eye.

Management
We educated the patient about his condition and scheduled him to return monthly for the next 6-8 months. Further, we corresponded with his internist, suggesting a complete blood count with differential and platelets, an erythrocyte sedimentation rate, 2D echocardiogram, carotid/transcranial doppler, fasting blood sugar and lipid profiles, and reevaluation of his hypertension. Finally, we scheduled the patient for a retinal consultation.

The patient cancelled his appointment with the retina service and all other follow-up visits for over four months. He failed to answer phone calls, return messages or respond to registered mail.

When the patient finally returned, his chief complaint was painful, blurry vision in the left eye. His history was unchanged, but the laboratory tests we recommended hadn't been done. Visual acuity in his right eye was stable, but in his left eye was now 20/200. External examination revealed normal motilities. Confrontation fields found a deeper relative central scotoma. The swinging-flashlight test demonstrated a grade II relative afferent pupillary defect in the left eye.

Figure 2. Rubeosis irides appeared in the patient's left eye after he had been lost to follow-up for more than four months.

Biomicroscopy unveiled a red, injected left eye with circumlimbal flush. The anterior chamber was inflamed with grade III cells and flare and rubeosis irides (figure 2). Sussman pressure gonioscopy revealed angle neovascularization with synechial closure in at least two quadrants. Applanation pressures measured 16mm Hg O.D., 50mm Hg O.S.

At this visit we diagnosed neovascular glaucoma secondary to ischemic central retinal vein occlusion. We started the patient on atropine 1 percent, Iopidine (apraclonidine 1 percent), timolol 0.5 percent BID and prednisolone 1 percent every two hours O.S. We also prescribed two 250mg tablets of Diamox (acetazolamide) by mouth. Dilated fundus examination was consistent with previous findings, with no neovascularization of the retina or disc. Within 50 minutes the intraocular pressure measured 27mm Hg O.S.

We explained to the patient that this was a serious ocular problem requiring immediate attention. We arranged for him to see our retinal specialist and continued him on atropine 1 percent BID, timolol 0.5 percent BID, prednisolone every two hours O.S. and a 500mg sequel of Diamox BID.

The retinal specialist confirmed our diagnosis. Panretinal photocoagulation was performed to arrest the neovascularization. Today the patient is comfortable with 20/300 vision O.S., grade I cells and flare O.S. and IOPs of 13mm Hg O.D. and 20mm Hg O.S. He remains on the topical medications described previously. The Diamox was discontinued.

Discussion
Neovascular glaucoma is characterized by increased intraocular pressure with optic nerve damage secondary to aberrant blood vessel growth over the anterior surface of the iris and angle. A dual mechanism elevates IOP: the fragile vessels leak fluid; and fibrovascular tissues in the anterior chamber angle obstruct aqueous outflow .1-4 Contraction of this tissue leads to synechial angle closure and secondary glaucoma.2 Neovascular glaucoma is an ocular urgency with a poor visual prognosis.1-14

Diseases Linked To Iris Neovascularization

Ocular Vascular Disease
• Retinal venous obstruction (central, hemispheric, branch)
• Diabetic retionopathy
• Central retinal artery occlusion
• Sickle cell retinopathy

Systemic Vascular Disease
• Carotid occlusive disease
• Hypertension
• Giant cell arteritis
• Diabetes mellitus
• Sickle cell hemoglobinopathies

Inflammatory Disease
• Chronic uveitis
• Sarcoidosis
• Lyme disease
• Syphilis
• Systemic lupus erythematosus
• Sturge-Weber syndrome

Neoplastic disease
• Retinoblastoma
• Melanoma (choroidal or iris)
• Neurofibromatosis

Retinal Disease
• Retinal detachment
• Chronic glaucoma (open angle)
• Coats' disease
• Persistent hyperplastic primary vitreous
• Trauma

Epidemiology. Ocular hypoxia generally precedes iris neovascularization. Ocular diseases associated with iris neovascularization include retinal microvascular disease, retinal vaso-occlusive disease, ocular neoplasms, retinal and ocular inflammation and retinal detachment (see table, at right).4,6,10 Central retinal vein occlusion accounts for a third of neovascular glaucoma cases. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy accounts for another third. Other cases result from pars plana vitrectomy, intracapsular cataract surgery or carotid artery obstructive disease.1,2,5,10 CRVO is usually seen in patients over 50.9 In younger patients, disorders that produce optic nerve swelling frequently cause obstruction of the central retinal veins.8

Pathophysiology. CRVO may be ischemic (nonperfused) or nonischemic (perfused). Thirty percent of CRVO become ischemic. Neovas-cular glaucoma occurs in 40-60 percent of these cases.9 Progression from the nonischemic to ischemic form occurs in 5-20 percent of such cases.8 The CRVO Study Group identified four factors associated with anterior segment neovascularization: retinal capillary nonperfusion on fluorescein angiography, retinal hemorrhage, acute nature and male gender.7 

The mechanism behind iris neovascularization and the subsequent glaucoma is complex. The ischemic retina produces hypoxia-induced angiogenic factors.17 Vasoproliferative material may diffuse anteriorly through the vitreous to initiate vessel growth.11 The nature of the angiogenesis factors is unknown.11,12 Antiangiogenic factors from the RPE regulate and reverse ocular neovascularization.1 New vessel growth results from an imbalance between these stimulatory and inhibitory factors.1,11,12

The process begins at the minor circle of the iris. Capillary buds progress to become vascular tufts, composed of fenestrated endothelial cells yet lack muscular layers and supportive tissues.1 These vessels extend radially over the iris surface toward the angle. When rubeosis reaches the angle it branches out across the trabecular meshwork as a fibrovascular membrane. The tissue ultimately contracts, pulling the iris toward the trabecular meshwork and forming localized peripheral anterior synechiae. The synechiae eventually coalesce and produce secondary angle closure. Traction along the iris surface can pull the posterior pigmented epithelium of the iris around the pupillary margin.

Signs and symptoms. Normal IOP and the presence of new vessel tufts at the pupillary margin mark the preglaucoma stage. These vessels may enlarge, coursing along the iris surface toward the angle, or they may regress. Gonioscopy can rule out angle neovascularization.

The open angle glaucoma stage results when the fibrovascular membrane occludes significant trabecular meshwork. Biomicroscopy may reveal anterior chamber inflammation with or without hyphema. This typically occurs 8-15 weeks after the initial occlusive event, hence the term "90-day glaucoma."2

The synechial angle closure stage presents with pain and photophobia. Visual acuity declines and IOP may be as high as 60mm Hg.1 You may observe a steamy, edematous cornea, iris neovascularization, cells, flare, peripheral anterior synechiae and ectropion uvea.

Management. The CRVO Study Group found no benefit in performing panretinal photocoagulation before observing iris or angle neovascularization in patients who had frequent follow-up exams.7 Monthly follow-ups during the first 6-8 months are indicated. The investigators recommend monthly follow-ups after photocoagulation until the anterior segment neovascularization regresses.18

Medical therapy for neovascular glaucoma includes topical beta blockers, alpha2 agonists and oral carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Atropine 1 percent and topical corticosteroids are indicated for the pain and inflammation. Miotics are contraindicated. Early detection of the neovascularization is critical. Prompt panretinal photocoagulation can cause the neovascularization to regress and, thus, prevent glaucoma. It seems to work by reducing retinal hypoxia and the release of angiogenic factors.

Peripheral retinal cryotherapy is an alternative. Other modalities to reduce IOP include filtration shunts and cyclodestructive procedures.19-22 When vision fails, therapy is redirected toward pain management. Topical atropine and corticosteroids are common choices. Retrobulbar alcohol injection and enucleation are final measures.

Dr. Gurwood is associate professor at Pennsylvania College of Optometry and attending optometrist at its Eye Institute. Dr. Mileski is in private practice.

1. Wand M. Neovascular Glaucoma. In: Ritch R, Shields MB, Krupin T (eds). The Glaucomas, 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book Inc. 1996:1073-1130.
2. Shields MB. Glaucomas Associated with Disorders of the Retina, Vitreous and Choroid. In: Shields MB. Textbook of Glaucoma, 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins 1998:269-86.
3. Thimons JJ. Secondary Glaucomas. In: Lewis TL, Fingeret M. (eds.) Primary Care of the Glaucomas. East Norwalk, Conn.: Appleton & Lange 1993:301-22.
4. Fisch BM. Gonioscopy and the Glaucomas. Stoneham, Mass.: Butterworth-Heinemann 1993:87-92.
5. Kanski JJ. The Glaucomas. In: Kanski JJ. Clinical Ophthalmology, 3rd ed. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann 1994:260-61.
6. Sperduto RD, Hiller R, Chew E, Seigel D, Blair N, et. al. Risk factors for hemiretinal vein occlusion: comparison with risk factors for central and branch retinal vein occlusion. The Eye Disease Case Control Study. Ophthalmology 1998;105:765-71.
7. The Central Retinal Vein Occlusion Study Group. A randomized clinical trial of early panretinal photocoagulation for ischemic central vein occlusion. The Central Vein Occlusion Study Group N Report. Ophthalmology 1995;102:1434-44.
8. Gass JDM. Macular Dysfunction Caused by Retinal Vascular Diseases. In: Gass JDM. Stereoscopic Atlas of Macular Diseases, 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book Inc. 1997:437-599.
9. Clarkson JG. Central Retinal Vein Occlusion. In: Ryan SJ. Retina, 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book Inc. 1994:1379-85.
10. Williamson TH, Ruimley A, Lowe GDO. Blood viscosity, coagulation and activated protein C resistance in central retinal vein occlusion: a population controlled study. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:203-08.
11. Pe'er J, Folber R, Itin A, Gnessen H, Hemo I, Keshet E. Vascular endothelial growth factor upregulation in human central retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology 1998;105:412-16.
12. Tripathi RC, Li J, Tripathi BJ, Chalam KV, Adamis AP. Increased level of vascular endothelial growth factor in aqueous humor of patients with neovascular glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1998;105:232-37.
13. Kubota T. Tawara A, Hata Y, Khalil A, Inomata H. Neovascular tissue in the intertrabecular spaces in eyes with neovascular glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:750-54.
14. Browning DJ, Scott AW, Peterson CB, Wawrnock J, Azhang AZ. The risk of missing angle neovascularization by omitting screening gonioscopy in acute central retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology 1998;105:776-84.
15. Hart Jr. WM. Intraocular Pressure. In: Hart Jr. WM (ed.). Adler's Physiology of the Eye, 9th ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book Inc. 1992:248-67.
16. Snell RS, Lemp MA. The Eyeball. In: Snell RS, Lemp MA. Clinical Anatomy of the  Eye, 2nd ed. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Science Inc. 1998:132-213.
17. The Branch Vein Occlusion Study Group. Argon laser scatter photocoagulation for prevention of neovascularization and vitreous hemorrhage in branch vein occlusion. A randomized clinical trial. Arch Ophthalmol 1986;104:34-41.
18. The Central Vein Occlusion Study Group. Natural history and clinical management of central retinal vein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:486-91.
19. Mills RP, Reynolds A, Emond MJ, Barlow WE, Leen MM. Long-term survival of molteno glaucoma drainage devices. Ophthalmology 1996;103:299-305.
20. Mastropasqua L, Carpineto P, Ciancaglini M, Zuppardi E. Long-term results of Krupin-Denver valve implants in filtering surgery for neovascular glaucoma. Ophthalmologica 1996;210:203-06.
21. Eid TE, Katz LJ, Spaeth GL, Augsburger JJ. Tube-shunt surgery versus neodymium: YAG cyclophotocoagulation in the management of neovascular glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1997;104:1692-1700.
22. Tsai JC, Bloom PA, Franks WA, Khaw PT. Combined transscleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation and transscleral retinal photocoagulation for refractory neovascular glaucoma. Retina 1996;16(2):164-66.

 

| | | | | |