PATIENT CARE

Six Signs to Tracing Visual Field Loss

Visual fields can uncover serious pathologies-if you're attuned to looking for them.


Joseph W. Sowka, O.D. Alan G. Kabat, O.D.,
Contributing Editors




Vision loss is among our patients' greatest fears. So, when a patient begins to notice that a portion of his or her vision is diminished or absent, it can result in a great deal of anxiety.


In fact, some adults may be more afraid of losing their vision than they are of dying. That's why we must always regard any new complaint of visual field loss as an urgent situation.

In many cases, visual field loss indicates an underlying pathology such as stroke, brain tumor or even multiple sclerosis.

In this ninth and final installment of our "Review of Symptoms" series, we'll examine the etiologies of visual field loss and offer some key clinical pearls for managing this challenging scenario.

Anatomy
To properly diagnose field defects and recognize their significance, you must first understand the anatomy of the visual pathway.

Try to think of the visual pathway as a "highway through the brain" and visual field defects as a "roadmap" to intraorbital and intracranial disease.

The pathway begins as retinal fibers from each eye exit the globe via the optic nerve. The nerves from each eye course through the orbit and merge to form the optic chiasm. At this point, decussation, or crossing of fibers occurs.

The temporal fibers from each eye remain on the ipsilateral side, but the nasal fibers decussate to the contralateral tract. However, there is no crossing of fibers from superior to inferior.

From the chiasm, all fibers from each half of the visual field travel through the brain on the opposite side. The fibers that constitute the visual field right of fixation travel post-chiasmally through the left brain, and vice versa.

Beyond the chiasm, the fibers form the optic tract and terminate in synapses at the lateral geniculate nucleus. New fibers then course posteriorly through the temporal and parietal lobes, and ultimately converge within the occipital cortex. We call this portion of the pathway the optic radiations.

The system becomes more organized as it proceeds toward the visual cortex, lending additional predictive value to visual field analysis.

When you're armed with a solid comprehension of the visual pathway anatomy and the "rules of the road," fields can help you identify or confirm the etiology of practically any given defect. This series of questions will help you arrive at a proper diagnosis when analyzing a patient's visual field.

  1. Is the field loss unilateral or bilateral? A purely unilateral field defect involves damage to the eye or optic nerve anterior to the chiasm. Remember that the post-chiasmal pathway involves fibers from both eyes, so any damage there will manifest as a bilateral defect.

    However, a disease process such as glaucoma or macular degeneration can simultaneously affect the optic nerve or retina in both eyes. Always rule out ocular pathology and optic nerve disease before reviewing the fields in these cases.

  2. Does the field defect respect the vertical meridian? Field defects that respect the vertical meridian indicate chiasmal or retrochiasmal lesions. However, in end-stage diseases such as glaucoma and chiasmal compression from a pituitary tumor, the field defect will breach the meridians as complete field loss ensues.

  3. Does the field show a pattern? These visual field defects that characterize specific disorders are easy to recognize:

    Central scotoma. This involves the central 5 to 50 degrees surrounding fixation. Central scotoma usually indicates damage to the macular photoreceptors or to the papillomacular nerve fibers at or within the optic nerve. If the scotoma incorporates the blindspot, the optic nerve is certainly involved.

    Conditions that present with this type of defect include various maculopathies; ischemic, inflammatory or infectious optic neuropathies; demyelinating optic neuropathy; toxic/nutritional optic neuropathy; compressive optic neuropathy; and optic atrophy. Demyelinating neuropathy may induce an assortment of field defects. The presentation varies among patients and, sometimes, even between eyes.


    Cecocentral scotoma. This defect extends from the physiologic "blindspot" through and into the point of fixation. Although a central scotoma may also encompass the blindspot, a cecocentral scotoma is smaller and typically dumbbell shaped. A cecocentral loss implicates the optic neuropathies detailed above.

    Altitudinal scotoma. These defects involve the field above or below the point of fixation, but do not cross the horizontal midline-at least not initially.

    Altitudinal defects may involve or spare fixation, depending on the underlying pathology. Typically, this type of defect extends to the periphery.


    You'll encounter this more often in anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AION), demyelinating optic neuropathy and glaucoma than in other diseases. Retinal disease or detachment also can present with altitudinal field loss, but this should be easy to recognize when you perform indirect ophthalmoscopy.

    Arcuate scotoma. This is actually a mild form of an altitudinal defect. It does not involve fixation, but rather the areas just peripheral to it. Arcuate scotoma is the hallmark of glaucoma, but it also may indicate optic disc edema or demyelinating optic neuropathy.

    Junctional scotoma. This is the only situation in which unilateral optic nerve disease results in a bilateral field defect.

    Junctional scotoma is an ipsilateral central scotoma with a contralateral superior temporal quadrantanopsia. It results from damage to the most posterior optic nerve at the chiasmal junction, known as anterior genu of Von Wilbrand.

    Its presence indicates a compressive lesion, most commonly a pituitary adenoma with a post-fixed chiasm. However, recent insights in medicine question the existence of this defect, as anatomically there is controversy over the existence of the anterior genu of Von Wilbrand.

    Hemianopia and quadrantanopsia. You may describe a visual field defect as a hemianopia if it involves the field either to the left or right of the point of fixation, but does not cross the vertical midline.

    A quadrantanopsia is simply a more specialized hemianopia that involves both the vertical and horizontal midlines.

    Hemianopic defects tend to localize to the pathway posterior to the chiasm.


  4. If bilateral, is the defect homonymous? Homonymous visual field defects always localize to the post-chiasmal visual pathway. When the defect is non-homonymous, the lesion may be located at either the chiasm or optic nerves, but no further back.

    Bitemporal field loss is the calling card of chiasmal disease. Recall that the nasal fibers cross within the chiasm, so the damage to this area will manifest as a loss of temporal field in both eyes.

    The etiology of chiasmal disease is usually compressive and may involve either vascular lesions or neoplasms. The two most common conditions are pituitary adenoma and craniopharyngioma.

    Pituitary tumors usually present with a bitemporal defect that is initially denser above the horizontal midline; craniopharyngiomas present with a defect that is initially denser below. Of course, cases of complete bitemporal hemianopia are not diagnostic in and of themselves. Neuroimaging can confirm the mass.

    Binasal defects rarely indicate chiasmal disease; rather, they almost always are a sign of bilateral optic nerve disease (such as glaucoma, chronic papilledema or buried disc drusen). Although damage to the lateral aspect of the chiasm on both sides would also produce this defect, there are few conditions capable of causing this type of lesion. Presumably, the only disorder that you can implicate is bilateral simultaneous internal carotid aneurysms.

  5. If the defect is bilateral and homonymous, which side of the field is affected? Homonymous defects that affect the left side of the field indicate a post-chiasmal lesion on the right side of the brain. Conversely, right-sided field defects indicate post-chiasmal damage within the left side of the brain.

    The pathway splits within the optic radiations as the superior fibers travel within the parietal lobe and the inferior fibers course through the temporal lobe.

    Temporal lobe lesions present with a superior quadrant loss, sometimes called a "pie in the sky" defect. Parietal lobe lesions may present with a wedge-shaped, inferior quadrant defect ("pie on the floor") or may cross the horizontal raphe and present as a complete hemianopic defect. The explanation: While only inferior fibers pass through the temporal lobe, all pathway fibers ultimately pass through the parietal lobe in the region of the parieto-occipital junction. So, the extent of a defect in parietal lobe disease can vary significantly.

    Also consider that the superior and inferior fibers are segregated within the occipital lobe. Lesions to the occipital cortex above the calcarine fissure yield inferior defects, and lesions that strike the cortex below the calcarine fissure yield superior defects. Hence, true quadrantanopsia is more indicative of disease within the occipital lobe.

    Most post-chiasmal lesions arise from cerebrovascular accident or stroke. However, they also may occur because of compressive tumors, vascular anomalies, trauma or demyelinating plaques in multiple sclerosis.

  6. Is the defect congruous? In other words, does the field defect of one eye greatly resemble that of the other eye in shape, extent and laterality? Because the visual pathway becomes more organized as it proceeds toward the cortex, more posterior lesions generally demonstrate greater congruity.

    The more congruous the visual field defect, the more posterior in the pathway the lesion is likely to be. In fact, lesions of the posterior occipital cortex are likely to produce bilateral field defects nearly identical in shape and size, except for the presence of the blindspot in one eye. However, you cannot localize a complete homonymous hemianopia within the visual pathway with any certainty, except to say that it is posterior to the chiasm.

    A complete hemianopic defect indicates extensive damage involving all the fibers in the pathway on one side of the brain. This type of damage is just as plausible at the level of the lateral geniculate nucleus as it is at the level of the parietal lobe or the occipital cortex.

Of course, volumes can and have been written on the various other subtleties of pathway damage. But, what we primary care doctors must always remember is that visual field defects often are an indication of underlying disease involving the optic nerve or brain. Even simple confrontation fields can be diagnostic for brain lesions.

Consider the anatomy of the visual pathway, the rules of the road, signs, symptoms, history and, of course, the series of questions discussed here. If you find a defect, the patient must undergo neuroimaging to find and, hopefully, correct the disorder or prevent it from getting worse. u

Drs. Sowka and Kabat are on the faculty at Nova Southeastern University College of Optometry, Fort Lauderdale, Fla.



top
Return to November Highlights

© Review of Optometry OnLine 
November 15, 2000 

| | | | | |