Case Report

Histopaghological Studies Confirm Rare Carcinoma

Referral for routine red eye reveals limbal tumor.

By APRIL D. RODGERS, O.D.;STEPHEN J. PHIPPS, M.D.;DANIEL PETLEY, O.D.

An 81-year-old white male was promptly referred to the eye clinic with the complaint of a red eye for the past 1-2 weeks. The referring doctor described redness in the medial aspect of the left eye that extended onto the cornea with conjunctival injection. The patient reported no vision loss, pain or foreign body sensation in the eye. There was no history of surgery or trauma to the eye.

The patient stated that he had used unspecified drops, given by the pharmacist to “get the red out,” for four days. His medical history was significant for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, colon polyps, bladder cancer, hypertension and iron deficiency anemia. He was on the following medications: albuterol and ipratropium bromide for bronchospasm, iron supplements and multivitamins. The patient reported an allergy to mercury.

Diagnostic Data

Best-correct visual acuity was 20/40 O.U. Pupils were equal, round and reactive to light, with no afferent defect. Motilities were unrestricted. Confrontation fields were full by facial Amsler and central finger counting O.U.

Biomicroscopy revealed a vascularized gelatinous lesion of the inferonasal limbus O.S., with maximal elevation of 1.5mm and irregular borders. It measured 5mm horizontally by 8mm vertically. A prominent sentinel vessel originated at the nasal canthus, crossed the bulbar conjunctiva and extended to the mass. The lesion encroached about 2mm onto the cornea.

Gonioscopy showed no evidence of invasion of the anterior chamber. Nuclear sclerosis was present in both eyes. All other anterior segment structures were unremarkable.

Intraocular pressures were 15mm Hg O.U. A dilated fundus exam revealed pigmentary changes of the macula O.U. This nuclear sclerosis appeared to account for the vision loss. The posterior segment was otherwise unremarkable.

Diagnosis

Differential diagnosis included squamous cell carcinoma, mucoepidermoid carcinoma, carcinoma in situ, squamous papilloma, dermoid, corneal fibrovascular pannus, inflamed pinguecula or pterygium and lymphoid cyst.

Management

We referred the patient to an ophthalmologist for immediate evaluation and possible excisional biopsy. The excision occurred six weeks later. Biopsy showed invasive, well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma of the conjunctiva and cornea.

The mass was removed and sent for histopathological examination. The lesion was highly vascularized and caused significant bleeding during surgery. After excision, double freeze-thaw cryotherapy was applied to the tissue surrounding the excision.

At the end of surgery, half-strength betadine was applied to the eye, followed by Maxitrol ointment (neomycin, polymyxin B, dexamethasone) and cyclogyl 1%. The eye was patched and covered with a shield.

At 1-day post-op, the patient admitted to taking aspirin qd. He reported that the eye “oozed blood until last evening, then it stopped.” He had also complained of aching pain in the left eye, which also ceased the night of the surgery.

External exam revealed blood-soaked gauze and a large clot protruding through the eyelids. The clot was removed, and the conjunctiva again began to bleed. The eye was re-patched repeatedly until the bleeding stopped. Vessel coagulation was scheduled for the next day, but was canceled because there was no observable bleeding. The patient was placed on polysporin qid and scopolamine bid in the left eye. Additional follow-up was scheduled in 3-4 days.

At 1-week post-op, the patient reported that the eye was comfortable with no pain or foreign body sensation. He continued the medications. Visual acuity in the left eye was now 20/70, 20/50 pinhole. External exam revealed trace left lower lid edema. The conjunctiva had mild inferonasal chemosis with resolving subconjunctival hemorrhage. A 8mm-by-10mm defect was evident in the conjunctiva. The inferonasal cornea had completely reepithelialized. The anterior chamber was quiet. The left pupil was round and dilated with drops. IOP was 11mm Hg. We told the patient to discontinue the scopolamine and taper the polysporin to bid.

At three weeks post-op, best-corrected visual acuity was 20/50, pinhole to 20/40 O.S. IOP was 17mm Hg. The cornea had completely healed, and the conjunctiva showed thinning at 7-10 o’clock. All other anterior segment structures were unremarkable. We discontinued the antibiotic and scheduled follow-up in a few weeks. We will monitor him closely over the next two years for possible recurrence of the lesion.

Discussion

Tumors of the conjunctiva and cornea look alike because their stem cells locate at the limbus. But their anatomy and function are very different.1 There are three general classes of epithelial tumors (see table above).

Epithelial dysplasia, carcinoma in situ and squamous cell carcinoma may all represent different stages of the same disease process.1,3 Invasive squamous cell carcinoma can arise from these precursors.2 Limbal lesions can be misdiagnosed as chronic conjunctivitis or conjunctival lesions such as papillomas, pterygia or pingueculae.1

Histopathological examination is essential.1,2,5 Conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia exists when dysplastic cells are present and the basement membrane is intact. If dysplastic cells breach the basement membrane, then this is invasive squamous cell carcinoma.1

The incidence of squamous cell carcinoma varies with geography,3 and declines 49% for every 10° increase in latitude from the equator.3,6 The main risk factor is sun exposure.3,5 Others are smoking, exposure to petroleum products, human papilloma virus and herpes simplex virus type 1.1,3

Patients are typically white, fair skinned, in their 40s and 50s, and typically male (a 6:1 predilection).1-3 Possible autosomal recessive conditions associated with squamous cell carcinoma are xeroderma pigmentosum and oculocutaneous albinism.3,7 Patients with the former tend to have a recurrence despite treatment.3

Cryotherapy with surgical excision decreases the recurrence rates vs. either procedure alone.1 Recurrence may result from inadequate excision. In surgery alone, the tumor will recur 15-52% of the time.3 Cryotherapy with excision reduces the rate to 7-22%, with the average being 12%.3 The lesion tends to return within two years of excision, but it has been reported to redevelop up to seven years after excision.3,8 Squamous cell metastasizes in fewer than 10% of cases.1

Tumors of the conjunctiva and cornea are not a typical finding during routine eye exams. This case shows histopathological examination is essential for a definitive diagnosis and effective treatment.

Dr. Rodgers recently graduated from Pennsylvania College of Optometry and now practices in Butler, Pa. Dr. Phipps is associated with Hershey (Pa.) Medical Center and Lebanon (Pa.) Veteran’s Affairs Medical Center. Dr. Petley is on staff at the Lebanon VA Medical Center.

1. Schwartz GS, Holland EJ. Management of Conjunctiva and Cornea Neoplasia. In: Krachmer JH, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ, eds. Cornea Volume III Surgery of the Cornea and Conjunctiva. Philadelphia: Mosby 1997;1911-1924.
2 Arffa RC. Grayson’s Disease of the Cornea Fourth Edition. Philadelphia: Mosby 1997;707-733.
3. Yang J, Foster CS. Squamous cell carcinoma of the conjunctiva. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1997;37(4):73-85.
4. Olasode BJ, Bankole OO, Adeoye AO. Invasive squamous cell carcinoma of limbus: Case Report. East Afr Med J 1996;73 (9):627-8.
5. Bhattacharyya N, Wenokur RK, Rubin PA. Metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma of the conjunctiva: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Otolaryngol 1997;18 (3):217-9.
6. Newton R, Ferlay J, Reeves G, Beral V, Parkin DM. Effects of ambient solar UV radiation on incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the eye. Lancet 1996; 347(9013):1450-1.
7. Yanoff M, Duker JS. Ophthalmology. Philadelphia: Mosby 1999;5.1:15-17; 5.2:7-8; 7.12:2-4; 10.23:2-3.
8. Lee GA, Hirst LW. Retrospective study of ocular surface squamous neoplasia. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1997:25(4):269-76.

top

Return to this month's highlights

© Review of Optometry OnLine 
February 15, 2001